Hisserdude Megaloblatta Forum Supporter May 4, 2017 #41 talace said: Hi I am new to this but why don't they just DNA subjects to determine what they are? Click to expand... Yeah, I really think someone should just go ahead and do that already.
talace said: Hi I am new to this but why don't they just DNA subjects to determine what they are? Click to expand... Yeah, I really think someone should just go ahead and do that already.
N Nicolas Rousseaux Seventh Instar May 7, 2017 #42 Hisserdude said: Just how much smaller? What sex was it? Is it possible that T.petiveriana was just a runt? Click to expand... I'd say they were about the size of Therea regularis. Both sex were smaller. There were several specimens, all were about the same size
Hisserdude said: Just how much smaller? What sex was it? Is it possible that T.petiveriana was just a runt? Click to expand... I'd say they were about the size of Therea regularis. Both sex were smaller. There were several specimens, all were about the same size
Hisserdude Megaloblatta Forum Supporter May 7, 2017 #43 Nicolas Rousseaux said: I'd say they were about the size of Therea regularis. Both sex were smaller. There were several specimens, all were about the same size Click to expand... Hmm, well that's not that much smaller really, but the fact that they were all that size... So we either have a giant morph of T.petiveriana, or T.bernhardti. Thanks for the info Nicolas, really appreciate it!
Nicolas Rousseaux said: I'd say they were about the size of Therea regularis. Both sex were smaller. There were several specimens, all were about the same size Click to expand... Hmm, well that's not that much smaller really, but the fact that they were all that size... So we either have a giant morph of T.petiveriana, or T.bernhardti. Thanks for the info Nicolas, really appreciate it!